From 95433f64b8b4f6f9adf38eb895f5c558661fbe01 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: tjhintz Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2025 16:57:41 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Update co-op.org formatting --- co-op.org | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/co-op.org b/co-op.org index e973abd..d134da8 100644 --- a/co-op.org +++ b/co-op.org @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ much feedback on these ideas as possible from potential members! - Worker control: 1 worker = 1 vote + This means that every member of the co-op has equal say in the major decisions affecting the co-op. There can be no "bosses" except those voted for by the members themselves (who can then also be removed by @@ -74,6 +75,7 @@ decision is made. Possible options: - California provides a legal framework for creating, running, and operating worker-owned co-operatives. + This appears to be a decent option with many advantages including it is very cost-effective both in terms of corporate fees and tax-pass through schemes. The likely big downside is that few companies use @@ -84,6 +86,7 @@ decision is made. Possible options: - Standard Delaware Corp or LLC + It sounds like some co-ops have been able to form under more standard business vehicles. This would provide the advantage of a much more developed legal framework and services but may not provide